Review two fictional listing pairs to identify the missing identity, variant, quantity and condition evidence before comparing prices.
Two pairs, separate source records.
Shared values can guide a review. Keep each source record separate until identity and price conditions are established.
01
1688 and Taobao: shared clues.
Clues
The titles match. One demo variant shares identifier, colour and size values across both records. 1688 shows quantity tiers; Taobao shows variant prices.
Missing evidence
No verified cross-source identity link is supplied. Neither record states its condition or establishes that the item is new. Taobao also omits price_unit and minimum_order_quantity.
Review decision
Keep separate records pending human matching and confirmation of a comparable quantity-price basis.
02
Taobao and Goofish: condition needs review.
Clues
Goofish supplies asking_price and stated_condition; Taobao supplies variant listed_price values.
Missing evidence
Taobao omits condition. The records establish neither common item identity nor a matching variant.
Review decision
Keep asking and variant prices separate. Review identity and condition before inferring a price difference for one item.
Selected fields from the examples
Original fictional records. source_url and observed_at are null: no source was observed and no date is implied.